Week 12 “free” work

Chapter 15 of The Social Media Reader discussed how fans of Star Wars often want to create their own “products” using the characters, plots, music and or other material from the famous movies. However, how should the individuals owning the rights to Star Wars and other brands feel about this? Although people want to create, should they be free to do as they please? The chapter pointed out how new technologies are making it possible for fans to create effects that rival those used in the original films, which may cause some confusion as to what are official Star Wars products. I can see both sides of the debate. You would like your fans to feel connected and free to be creative, but you would also like to keep control of where they take your original ideas. I also thought the chapter made a good point when it discussed legal reasons for maintaining control over fan productions. For instance, if the Star Wars Franchise did not claim to have the rights to material that has been created from their products, what would happen if one of their official products appeared to go in a direction similar to one that a fan proposed? Would they be sued?

Chapter 4 from A Networked Self dealt with the idea of “free” online labor. This chapter discussed how corporations can benefit from the free work we do online, and whether or not this is a form of exploitation. For instance, it is possible for corporations to benefit from the online social networks that employees have built up. The individuals that make up these networks may be viewed as potential customers or even as potential hires. But what if companies started demanding access to one’s social network as a job requirement? What if the size and value of an individual’s network played a role in whether or not he obtained employment at a particular firm? These are all interesting questions that the chapter asked. The chapter also went on to point out, from the viewpoint of the authors, two important aspects of exploitation. These are coercion and control. That is, are individuals forced into doing this free work, and do they lose control of what they produce?

The Banks and Humphreys (2008) article asked the question of whether or not individuals are being tricked into doing free work for a global media industry. However, the article made reference to the fact that this free work we often provide is often enjoyable. This reminded me of Tom Sawyer attempting to trick kids into painting a fence for him by pretending that the work was fun. Who knew that it could actually be fun? This article made some very good distinctions between individuals who co-produced for economic gain, and those who just co-produced for social benefits. It was somewhat interesting when the paper discussed how placing a dollar value on co-production can sometimes take the fun out of doing the work.

The article was also good to point out some of the risks involved for companies who attempt to use user generated work. For instance, work that is outsourced to individuals may not coincide well with corporate schedules. If the work gets too demanding, these individuals may simply leave the project. After all, it may just be a hobby for them.

References:

Banks, J., & Humphreys, S. (2008). The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 401-418.

Mandiberg, M. (Ed.) (2012). The Social Media Reader. New York: NYU Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2010). A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.

16 thoughts on “Week 12 “free” work

  1. California recently enacted a law that forbids employers and universities from asking employees and applicants for their social media passwords. The ban failed at the federal level, but I wonder if other states will start enacting similar laws.

    http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/27/employers-banned-from-asking-for-social-media-passwords-in-california/

    Also, it’s interesting to consider how one’s social network could affect one’s job opportunities. You have to wonder how people would start adding connections (or deleting them, if they are connected to some questionable individuals) if this trend started to gain momentum.

  2. I think I had heard about a similar ban in Maryland, maybe? While I am not always a huge fan of the Marxist viewpoint, I do think it is important to consider at least the possibility that there could be exploitation going on, especially when companies like Facebook are involved.

  3. I think it depends on the context of the job as well. For example, if I sit in a cubicle and do data entry what does it matter what my social media footprint looks like? However, if I work in your communications department and am a regular face/voice of the organization for local or national news, then I think my persona on social media does concern my employer.

  4. I guess it would not matter as much if you were hidden away in a cubicle, but your network could still be utilized to further the goals of the organization. For example, your network could provide sales leads to the firm.

    • Exactly, and I think this is one of the issues Andrejevic wants us to consider. If I am your employer, do I have the right to mine your friends list for sales leads? Should I be spamming all your friends telling them to enroll in the grad programs in Communication at the Uof M??…..hmmmmmmm……um….can I be your FB friend?

  5. It’s interesting how as our access to interactive/participatory platforms increases, our identities and accountability spreads outward and we open ourselves up to new kinds of surveillance and critique. With the masks we already wear on a daily social basis, I think it’s a sensible business practice for employers to investigate the online personas of potential employees. As Meagan said, it is more logical to investigate this kind of information if someone’s job is related to communication, but nevertheless, information (or should I call it “intel”) is leverage no matter how you look at it. As we are urged to leak valuable information about ourselves on a regular basis within the confines of a seemingly community-based forum, I think the essential words of wisdom are: on guard! The light saber duel is never over.

  6. Einige Websites bieten auch die neuesten Lernmaterialien zur ISACA CCAK Prüfung im Internet. Aber sie haben keine zuverlässigen Garatie. Ich würde hier sagen, dass ZertPruefung einen Grundwert hat. Alle ISACA-Prüfungen sind sehr wichtig. Im Zeitalter der rasanten entwickelten Informationstechnologie ist ZertPruefung nur eine von den vielen. Warum wählen die meisten Menschen ZertPruefung? Dies liegt darin, die von ZertPruefung gebotenen Prüfungsfragen und Antworten wird Sie sicherlich in die Lage bringen, das Exam zu bestehen. wieso? Weil es die neuerlich aktualisierten Materialien bietet. Diese haben die Mehrheit der Kandidaten schon bewiesen.

  7. I can’t express how much I appreciate your article, it was truly memorable. These NSE7_EFW-7.2 new practice questions free questions were the key to my success. Grab them today for free to boost your career!

  8. Thank you for sharing this thought-provoking article! Wishing you the best of luck! Here are the free New CORe test certification cost study materials.

  9. In der heutigen konkurrenfähigen IT-Branche können Sie mit IT-Zertifikaten Schritt für Schritt befördert werden. Viele Firmen würden Ihnen einen Berufsaufstieg oder die Gehaltserhöhung laut dem Goldgehalt Ihrer Zertifikate geben. Die Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine Prüfung von hohem Goldgehalt. Das Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Associate Zertifikat könne die Bedürfnisse der hart arbeitenden IT-Fachleuten abdecken. ZertPruefung bietet Ihnen die zielgerichtete online Prüfungen zur MuleSoft-Integration-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung. Sie können im Internet teilweise die Prüfungsfragen und Anworten zur Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung kostenlos als Probe herunterladen.

  10. SAP C-S4CPR-2402인증시험을 어떻게 준비하면 될가 아직도 고민하고 계시죠? 학원에 등록하자니 시간도 없고 돈도 많이 들고 쉽게 엄두가 나지 않는거죠? Pass4Test제품을 구매하신다면 그런 부담을 이제 끝입니다. Pass4Test덤프는 더욱 가까지 여러분들께 다가가기 위하여 그 어느 덤프판매 사이트보다 더욱 저렴한 가격으로 여러분들을 맞이하고 있습니다. SAP C-S4CPR-2402덤프는Pass4Test제품이 최고랍니다.

  11. 我們不但能保證你通過OG0-093考試,還會為你提供一年的免費更新服務,如果不小心考試沒有成功,我們將會全額退款給你。但這種可能性幾乎不會發生的。我們是可以100%幫你通過OG0-093考試的,你可以先在網上下載我們提供的部分考題Testpdf免費嘗試。

  12. Many viewpoints in the article have been very inspiring, and I’ve benefited greatly. Get the New test camp aPHRi materials test that contributed to my promotion and salary raise, available for free today. Best wishes for your career!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *