Social Networking and Academia, 10-9-12

The idea of constructing a professional identity is interesting to me in the context of social networking sites. In A Networked Self, Giplin explains, “Public professional identities are constructed through a combination of social ties and relational content…Connections to other users on such sites have been described as ‘public displays of connection’ that add value and validity to an individual’s identity performance” (233). If we think about the idea of professional identity as it is shaped through our engagement with social networking sites, it seems like the online-networking arena lends itself more suitably to some professions than others. I’m thinking of academics (and perhaps specifically communication academics, and perhaps more specifically rhetoric academics).

My brother owns a body-care business and sells products to spas. He for sure has a twitter and Facebook account as to foster “information sharing, networking, and establishing professional expertise” (232). The success of his business greatly depends on his online presence and interaction because his associates, clients, and even competitors are always online. You would think that, based on the idea of “information sharing, networking, and establishing professional expertise,” that a profession in academia would go hand in hand with social networking. However, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

In class, we have talked at length about collapse among our social circles, and Giplin mentions, “Online interactive media further complicate the question of boundaries” (233). Through our in-class discussions, we have become spooked by the idea of privacy breakdown, although Danah Boyd in The Social Media Reader attempts (albeit pathetically) to argue in behalf of public disclosure (76). Most of my professors are super conservative in class and online about what they disclose to students, and I personally will not become “friends” with any of my students on Facebook until long after the semester is over. There is an inherent resistance to let those boundaries collapse in academia, even though one could argue that the students are our “clients,” or at least those of the university. What’s more is, I know graduate students who are incredibly leery of making public anything in their professional toolkit. Vitas, lesson plans, and teaching philosophies are kept locked up because of the fear that they will be copied or somehow altered.

This doesn’t mean that academics haven’t attempted to enter into the social networking world. Academia.com allows academics to network within a scholarly context, but my own account doesn’t seem to garner a lot of traffic, and I’m not really interested in other people’s profiles. Based on the principles of “information sharing, networking, and establishing professional expertise,” why wouldn’t academics take to the opportunities of online networking? Have they? Furthermore, Giplin says, “Constructing a professional identity also means constructing the identity of the profession” (234). How can communication scholars help the much needed effort to construct a distinct discipline for the professional world of communication, especially amid the barriers I’ve mentioned?

10 thoughts on “Social Networking and Academia, 10-9-12

  1. Speaking of academics and Twitter, there was a whole “Twittergate” conversation buzzing around last week, as academics started getting into a (sometimes heated) discussion of the ethics of live tweeting academic conferences. It seems to have started in English (according to Inside Higher Ed) with some group of scholars arguing against live tweeting, something which I personally find bizarre. Why wouldn’t I want more people to know about my work? At any rate, while the hubub seems to have mostly died down, it is good food for thought. Here are some links:
    http://storify.com/adelinekoh/what-are-the-ethics-of-live-tweeting-at-conference.html
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/10/02/scholars-debate-etiquette-live-tweeting-academic-conferences
    http://scientopia.org/blogs/proflikesubstance/2012/10/02/english-profs-want-to-control-the-internet/
    http://tressiemc.com/2012/10/05/black-femalethinking-out-loud-twittergate/

  2. The question of information sharing among professionals who might gain and advance their own ideas and in so doing, the ideas of a society is an interesting one. You would think that academics, being a thoughtful bunch might want to help one another out and in not being too possessive of ideas, keep their respective fields of study buzzing and cutting edge. But, from what we’ve discussed in class about publishing alone and the amount of time that elapses between the writing of an article and the actual availability of that article, there are some definite problems in remaining as current. I suppose the real problem is that despite one’s desire to advance a field, it is still more valuable and beneficial to one’s own life support to advance the individual before the field.

  3. Such an inspiring read, thank you for sharing this! Sharing the FCSS_SASE_AD-23 certification test questions test that contributed to my promotion and salary hike, and it’s free for you to access today. Best of luck in achieving your career aspirations!

  4. SAPたぶん、P_BTPA_2408試験に合格するのが難しいと思うほど多くの受験者がいます。 しかし、今では、それについて心配する必要はありません。優れた試験資料を提供するからです。 当社Fast2testのP_BTPA_2408試験教材は非常に有用であり、テストで高得点を獲得するのに役立ちます。 また、タイミングの機能と試験をシミュレートする機能が強化されるため、回答の速度を向上させ、テストの準備を完全に行うことができます。 P_BTPA_2408試験トレントは、試験に合格し、理想的な仕事を見つけるのに役立ちます。 P_BTPA_2408試験資料の内容についてご質問がある場合は、カスタマーサービスがオンラインで満足のいく回答を提供します。 製品を購入する前に、SAP Certified Professional – Solution Architect – SAP BTPガイド急流の特徴と利点を次のように詳細に理解してください。

  5. Oracle 1z1-071試験を難しく感じる人に「やってもいないのに、できないと言わないこと」を言いたいです。我々JpshikenへのOracle 1z1-071試験問題集は専業化のチームが長時間で過去のデータから分析研究された成果で、あなたを試験に迅速的に合格できるのを助けます。依然躊躇うなら、弊社の無料のOracle 1z1-071デモを参考しましょう。そうしたら、Oracle 1z1-071試験はそんなに簡単なことだと知られます。

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *