Beldad, de Jong and Steehouder in my opinion did an excellent job in discussing the ways in which people respond to risks in privacy, specifically as it relates to the sharing of information online. They classified different categories of people based on the level of oncern that they have for the privacy of their information (privacy fundamentalist, pragmatist, and privacy unconcerned), gave 3 categories of the nature of privacy (privacy of the person, privacy of personal behavior, privacy of personal communications, and privacy of personal data) how people respond to the sharing of online information based on some of these categories. While some people have no qualms whatsoever about entering and sharing personal information, others are more skeptical and use different measures in determining whether or not it is appropriate to do so. Many people seek to measure the amount of control that they have over the spread of information once submitted, whereas some people look at the risk/reward aspect of sharing their information. In other words, are the benefits of sharing this information worth the possible ramifications that may occur if something goes awry? I think that in many cases, I myself use this approach to making these decisions. As a result, I for the 1st time last month made an online purchase. I was extremely leery about submitting the necessary information (credit card numbers, etc.) to set up online accounts and make online purchases. However, after doing research and talking with close acquaintances who regularly make online purchases, I now am more comfortable in doing so.
Bolde analyzed the privacy policies of Google, the primary search engine that we all use for instant clarification of information. Although they do have protective measures in place, you have to read the fine print!!! Google is extremely cautious in the terminology that it uses in its privacy statements. “Lexical choice”, or “the systematic use or avoidance of words” is the primary measure that Google uses in order to C.T.B. (cover their behinds) in case of privacy infringement. They also state that while they have the right to share user information with third parties, it is degigned to “provide you with a better experience and to improve the quality of our services.” However, they do not tell you that this allows them to increase revenue based on the on-site advertising that they are able to create based on the use of this information. Google benefits just as much as the user does, but does not reveal how it simultaneously benefits from it.
Last but certainly not least, this week’s main event – Jurgeson/Rey vs. Ford!!! Both sides made some good points, and even agreed in some small areas in this debate. Jurgeson and Rey ended their piece by stating that Ford’s opinions have opened the door for future dialogue in reference to the classification of private vs. public. Personally, my stance is pretty clear, especially as it relates to social media – once you click on the “submit”/”send” button, your private thoughts have now become public!!!! Even with this blog, once I hit the “publish” button, I may come back 2 minutes later and edit something that I’ve said. However, if 1 person saw what was written prior to my editing, that is enough to “copy/paste” my statements, and share it with whomever they choose. Pictures, same principle – any picture is one “right click/save” away from being shared with the rest of the world, even after you have removed it. And let’s not even mention the newest cell phone technology, “screen shots”!!!!! One snap shot can make any text message, picture, e-mail, web posting or anything else public domain, even if it is intended to be private.
Despite leery feeling when you give your personal information, I guess that we already passed the point that the risk of sharing information surpassed the convenience of sharing info with others. Or maybe our life style has been completely changed. For example, I do not go to a mall or any other store except grocery shopping, and shop online because I do not like the time usage associated with physical shopping.
Also, in my point of view, given the blurry boundary between private and public, the continuum model makes more sense to me.
Choi, I like the continuum model too. Once you let one person in on something, you begin to move along the continuum. And once this begins, there is no telling how far along the continuum it will move. This is especially true in our new technological environment that allows for easy replication and dissemination.
I would be interested to know why you were previously so leery about online purchases – and what finally tipped you over the edge. Was it an issue of trust, or something else?
I am paranoid!!! Particularly about submitting sive information online. I did a little research on the security of submitting online information, which led me to the differences between “http” and “https”. This made me feel a little better about online security. Next, take my sister, who does everything online. She assured me (although it took long time) that as long as the site is a legitimate site that I had nothing to worry about. What finally drove me to the first online purchase was that I needed an alumni outfit that was only available via PayPal purchase. In other words, I had no choice!!!
Thank you for your article, it was incredibly thought-provoking. The SPI latest test questions questions helped me achieve my career goals, and I’m offering them to you for free today!
Your article is brilliant beyond words, I’m thankful for your share! Best of luck! Here are the Reliable study Databricks-Machine-Learning-Associate questions resources, free for everyone!
ExamFragen kann Ihnen Ihren Stress zur Fortinet FCP_FAZ_AD-7.4 Zertifizierungsprüfung im Internet überwinden. Die Lernmaterialien zur Fortinet FCP_FAZ_AD-7.4 Zertifizierungsprüfung enthalten Kurse, Online-Prüfung, Lerntipps im Internet. Unser ExamFragen hat Simulationsprüfungen, das Ihnen helfen, die Fortinet FCP_FAZ_AD-7.4 Prüfung ganz einfach ohne viel Zeit und Geld zu bestehen. Wenn Sie unsere Lernmaterialien haben und sich um die Prüfungsfragen kümmern, können Sie ganz leicht das Zertifikat bekommen.
That piece was incredibly insightful. Strengthen your IT expertise with free C-C4H320-34 test guide online. Good luck and best wishes!
Liking it right away—this content is superb. Get free Free CTAL-TA learning cram to elevate your IT abilities. Best of luck in your exams!
SOA-C02시험은 영어로 출제되는 만큼 시험난이도가 높다고 볼수 있습니다.하지만 SOA-C02덤프만 있다면 아무리 어려운 시험도 쉬워집니다. 오르지 못할 산도 정복할수 있는게 SOA-C02덤프의 우점입니다.SOA-C02덤프로 시험을 패스하여 자격증을 취득하시면 굳게 닫혔던 취업문도 자신있게 두드릴수 있습니다. SOA-C02덤프를 구매하시고 공부하시면 밝은 미래를 예약한것과 같습니다.
Brilliant content; I’m clicking the like button. This GMLE Interactive eBook enabled me to get a promotion and salary increase. It’s free for everyone now. Wishing you all success in your career advancements!
I’m grateful for your article, it truly made an impact on me. Please wish me all the best for the upcoming Practice C-THR94-2405 exam fee exam!
The article is so insightful and inspiring, thanks for sharing! Free access to Terraform-Associate-003 valid test pattern’s extensive content is offered, with the aim of supporting you.