Kevin Gideon Dissertation Final Defense

The College of Education

Announces the Final Examination of

Kevin Almack Gideon

for the degree of

Doctor of Education

June 13, 2016 at 1:00 pm

405 Ball Hall, University of Memphis

Memphis, TN

 

Biographical Sketch

Bachelor of Arts, History, Rhodes College

Master of Arts in Teaching, Education, Cumberland University

Education Specialist, Leadership, University of Memphis

Advisory Committee

Lee Allen, Ed.D., Associate Professor, Instruction and Curriculum Leadership, Committee chair

Jeffery Byford, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Instruction and Curriculum Leadership

Louis Franceschini III, Ph.D., Research Assistant Professor, Department of Leadership

Renee Murley, Ed.D., Clinical Associate Professor, Instruction and Curriculum Leadership

Major Field of Study

Instruction and Curriculum

Period of Preparation: 2013 – 2016

Comprehensive Examination Passed: August 2015

DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE PARTNERSHIPS IN A MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Abstract

In 2014, the City of Bartlett, Tennessee created a municipal school system to serve the educational needs of the community.  To maintain the school system and further the education of it students, as well as establish meaningful relationships in the community, business-education partnerships should be developed.  The purpose of these partnerships would be to promote academic growth while also fostering civic responsibility.  A quantitative study was conducted using a survey tool to ascertain the key attributes (goals, characteristics, challenges and activities) associated with the formation of partnerships between Bartlett City Schools and businesses located within the city limits of Bartlett, Tennessee.  Based upon the results of the survey and analysis using the Friedman test, the nonparametric equivalent of the Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (R-ANOVA), coupled with systematic use of the Wilcoxon Signed Rank procedure, the analog to dependent t-test, to identify differences, several findings became clear.

Both business and education participants identified “workforce preparedness” as the primary goal for such a partnership. They also identified that the primary characteristics for a business-education partnership to develop were “a clear vision of what the partnership wants/plans to achieve” along with “good communication” and “specific, achievable goals.” The study further found that the primary challenges impacting business-education partnerships were insufficient “human resources” and “financial resources.”  Noteworthy were the differences in commitment level observed between the business and education sectors for the following activities, “financial incentives” and “workplace tours.”

Building upon the positions of the business and education sectors in Bartlett, Tennessee, the researcher further believed this study indicated a shift in the focus of business-education partnerships. The demand for workforce preparedness, coupled with mentoring, and internship based learning and experiences signaled a resurgence of the vocational movement that has had a cyclical impact on education since the early 1900s.

Chandra Alston Dissertation Final Defense

The College of Education

Announces the Final Examination of

Chandra Alston

for the degree of

Doctor of Education

June 10, 2016 at 11:00 am

115 Browning Hall, University of Memphis

Memphis, TN

 

Biographical Sketch

Bachelor of Science, Business Administration, UT Martin

Master of Business Administration, Management, Union University

Advisory Committee

Jeffery Wilson, PhD, Associate Professor, Leadership, Committee chair

Colton Cockrum, EdD, Director of QEP, Academic Coaching and Support Services

Wendy Griswold, PhD, Assistant Professor, Leadership

Lamont Simmons, EdD, Assistant Professor, Social Work

Major Field of Study

Higher and Adult Education

Period of Preparation: 2009-2016

Comprehensive Examination Passed: April 23, 2012

 

Evaluating Leadership Frames, Employee Engagement, and Retention: A Study of Administrators in Higher Education

 Abstract

This study was an examination of administrators in higher education organizations in the State of Tennessee. Administrators were asked to identify their supervisors’ leadership styles. This information was then used to evaluate administrator’s levels of engagement and their intent to stay (retention). To describe the supervisors’ leadership styles, the researcher employed Lee G. Bolman and Terrence E. Deal’s Leadership Orientations Instrument (LOI) Other (1991b), while engagement level was measured using the A.B. Bakker and W.B. Schaufeli’s Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (2003). Retention was gauged by how long the administrator planned to remain in their position.

Respondents included 445 higher education administrators categorized into five groups: 1) top executive and senior institutional officers; 2) academic deans; 3) institutional administrators; 4) heads of divisions, departments and centers; and 5) academic associate and assistant deans. Based on the results of the study, there was a statistically significant relationship between leadership style and engagement. Therefore, leadership style did predict engagement. The structural leadership style had the strongest relationship with all the elements of engagement followed by the human resource leadership style. The political style had a significant relationship with the absorption aspect of engagement. Leadership style was not a predictor of retention for higher education administrators.